Tag Archives: inclusive design

Universal Design Toolkit

With rising health care costs & disability challenges, today’s Boomer generation wants to age at home …
with independence, safety and peace of mind.

  Are you ready to meet their demands??

By Universal Design Expert and motivational speaker Rosemarie Rossetti

“My new book is a great resource as you prepare to live in your home for a lifetime. As a person who uses a wheelchair and designed and built my home, the Universal Design Living Laboratory, let me help you remodel your home and know what to look for in your next home.

This is a great reference for occupational therapists, builders, remodelers, architects, interior designers, Realtors, physical therapists, and consumers.”

“Universal Design Toolkit: Time-saving ideas, resources, solutions, and guidance for making homes accessible” is a 200-page full color illustrated resource packaged with four hours of online videos and webinars.

Learn more, get a free chapter, and buy this Toolkit at Universal Design Toolkit

Advertisements

SYMPOSIUM – Speculative Design: Afrofuturist and indigenous projections

SYMPOSIUM

Speculative Design: Afrofuturist and indigenous projections

1.45-8PM, Wednesday 2 May 2018

Banqueting Suite, Chelsea College of Arts, 16 John Islip Street

London SW1P 4JU

This afternoon symposium brings together researchers and practitioners whose work engages with the themes of Afrofuturism, Indigenous Futures, and other emerging areas of science-fictional/future-orientated cultural practice in which people of colour, indigenous cultures and non-Western subjects take centre stage.

Speculative design will be addressed in terms of its ability to raise problems, rather than solve them. As a tool for speculation, it opens up spaces for presenting problems, to model alternatives, and to generate imaginative responses. It will be explored in relation to cultural practices including art, comics and science fiction writing.

SCHEDULE

13.30 – 14.00 Registration
14.00 – 14.15 Introduction to symposium proceedings

Dan Byrne-Smith

14.20 – 15.05 Keynote

Afrofuturism: Imaginaries, Realities and Practices

Professor Julian Henriques

15.10 – 15.55 Designing a Black Futurity

Florence Okoye

16.00 – 16.45 Finding Fatima: An exercise in location

Natascha Nanji

16.45 – 17.15 Break
17.15 – 18.00 Make It So: World-building in–and out of–Cyberspace

Skawennati

18.05 – 18.50 Keynote

This Is Not My Beautiful House:

Reclaiming Our Futures from a Techno-Orientalist Vision

Kelly Kanayama

18.50 – 20.00 Drinks

This symposium is convened by Dr Dan Byrne-Smith, Senior Lecturer in Fine Art theory, Chelsea College of Arts and presented by the Camberwell, Chelsea, Wimbledon Graduate School Public Programme.

Tickets: £8/6 concessions (includes a post-event drink)

Bookings: http://bit.ly/speculative-design-symposium

Makers Making Change

“We connect makers to people with disabilities who need assistive technologies.”

Our new site connects Makers, People with Disabilities and Disability Professionals to one another with the goal of providing people with disabilities with access to affordable open source assistive technologies.

Over the past year, hundreds of passionate volunteers in communities across Canada and the US joined our network to volunteer their time, skills, and tools to make a difference. Now it’s time to bring our project to the next level. By Nov 30, we will have a built a network of 500 volunteer makers and 500 people with disabilities.

Our new site features:
Events listings, a geolocation “maker matching service”, and open source library of free, tested open source assistive devices – including the ability to add your projects or ideas. We will have resources for teachers, librarians or makerspaces to get involved in Makers Making Change by exploring real life applications of design, simple electronics and 3d printing.

If you can help us with this critical aspect of the project, we will be super grateful! If you have projects or ideas you’d like to submit, now is the time! We are taking this next week to pre-populate our site with projects and test it out before the public gets to see it.

Process to be involved in MMC site testing:

* Please reply to this email to let me know you want to participate

* Sign up/Login to the MMC beta site here:
https://mmcprod.wpengine.com/login/

Sign up for several accounts if you like (using different emails) and see how each type of account reacts.
For example:

* As a Maker – try out features as a maker, click “submit a build” if you have a project, click connect and type in your postal code to see if there are any people with disabilities looking for devices in your area

* As a Person with a Disability – request a build, submit an idea

* As a Disability Professional – review a device

Note: Under 3)Complete your Profile, you may want to use different names under each created account to differentiate between them

Please supply feedback here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1PtMUzAmq7GxOHiH8ZFYPzXmTltV3ZumV51U1MCILXSE/edit?usp=sharing

by April 23rd if at all possible.

What You’re Getting Wrong About Inclusive Design

Inclusivity.

It’s one of the biggest buzzwords inside corporations right now. But the person who brought the practice of inclusive design to Microsoft–Kat Holmes–isn’t so sure that companies really get the idea yet.

Holmes has since founded an independent design practice focused on inclusive product developing, become a judge for our 2018 Innovation by Design Awards, and penned the upcoming book Mismatch. I interviewed Holmes in a frank conversation about my own confusion, and at times, even skepticism, regarding inclusive design as a salve for many of the world’s challenges. And what she taught me should be required reading for anyone tackling the broad topic of inclusivity in design–or business at large–today.

Designer Kat Holmes

Fast Company: So I very much believe in the grander idea of inclusive design–that by designing products through the lens of edge cases like disabilities first, they can often become better products for everyone. But lately, I’ve been wondering, does it make sense all the time? And has it been co-opted as a meaningless marketing phrase before it got off the ground? I’ve become a bit more skeptical in the last year, and I don’t even know how to bring that up to people.

Kat Holmes:  Like, you’re a jerk if you don’t like inclusivity!

 

FC: Exactly!

KH: That’s something I’ve had to contend with. The thing I’ve seen is that the word “inclusion” means a lot of different things to a lot of different people, but there’s been a wholesale agreement that it’s a good thing. However, there’s been very little discourse on what we actually mean by it.

You get people using the word and not always having the true intentions behind it. The Olympics and Paralympics were full of advertisements that highlighted demonstrations toward inclusion, but you look at what the companies are actually doing, and inclusion is not a core value.

What inclusion means can be mistaken. Being inclusive can be mistaken for being thoughtful, or just using appropriate language. The word is elevated so quickly in a corporate sense, it’s a good time to have discourse in what we mean by it.

FC: Okay, so what do you mean by “inclusive design”?

KH: The first thing I had to contend with was, I’d been using inclusion through the lens of disability. Thinking of people with disabilities, then, how we made things fit for them. But I met a lot of people who are working on gender-related projects or race-related projects saying, “This is inclusive design,” and I couldn’t wrap my head around how all of those things are part of the same design practice.

I took a look at the words “inclusive” and “exclusive,” and the root of both is claudere. It’s Latin for “to shut.” Exclude is to shut out. Include is to shut in. Thinking of that mental model, of ingroups and outgroups, I thought maybe there’s something wrong with the mental model in our language.

In my book, I ended up writing about exclusion first, because everyone, universally, says it’s the same thing. What is exclusion? It’s when you’re left out! Exclusion became the sharp point that allowed me to talk about inclusion.

I’ve now evolved my thinking to consider exclusion as a specific way to embody inclusive design. That may be as close as we get to a definition.

FC: So instead of creating inclusive design practices, because that’s so vague, we should start by eliminating exclusive design?

KH: Yeah. Because the thing with inclusive design, and the nuance that doesn’t come through, is that it was always about including excluded communities in the design process–not marketing to people with disabilities. It’s not, you’ve designed something for a female population, and therefore it’s inclusive. It’s, did you involve someone in your design process who was previously unable to participate? How you get there is what makes it inclusive, not that it’s targeted at an underrepresented or underserved community.

FC: You know, when I think about inclusive design, I always think about those perfect examples. The typewriter and curb cuts were both designed around disabilities, and they became a better way for anyone to record text or step off the street. That’s inclusive design! But you’re really saying that it’s not a product, it’s a process.

KH: Right. It is a challenge when we think of inclusive design as an outcome and object. Inclusive design is a process, not a result.

The nuance is, there’s no real method. When we think about inclusivity, we think it’s a good thing, but we haven’t been clear with each other how we got there, and what we expect the steps to be. That’s the real opportunity: a method, or guide to what inclusion is when you’re practicing it.

The typewriter, it works great for a huge number of people, but not great for people who don’t have hands, or use of their hands. But how the product got there was [considering the needs of a blind user]–that is the part that makes it an inclusive solution. Is it the solution for everybody? No.

FC: This brings me to something I’ve been thinking about a lot. Does inclusive design always make sense? For instance, I recently wrote about a transgender woman who had rented on Airbnb for years as a man. All of her reviews were stuck in old “he” pronouns. It was confusing to other renters, and terrible for her. There was no tool in Airbnb’s settings to fix other people’s comments. She was going to delete her account and start over when Airbnb customer service just fixed the problem by hand instead. But it made me wonder–would it actually make more sense for Airbnb to potentially complicate the platform to include settings for a very select few users? Or in this case, was it better that Airbnb just had a customer service solution ready to go instead?

KH: It’s another point of tension, the difference of being inclusive versus universal. Take the curb cut. It’s a great example of inclusive design that wasn’t universal. In the early version of those curb cuts, there was no indicator for someone who was blind that they were coming to the street corner. It was really bad! They had no indicator they were walking into the street.

The tension with universal design is how you design something that works for everyone in all scenarios, with every contingency. That’s one of the challenges of understanding inclusive design when we look at the object, saying, “This design is inclusive design.” In those cases, often what we mean is universal design.

Inclusive design works more as a verb. With Airbnb, it’s, “Did they include transgender, or people with a range of genders, in the process and draw from it different solutions?” That, to me, is the nuance of inclusive design–in this case, drawing from that expertise people have in the transgender community.

FC: Is it frustrating that so many people–even people like myself who write about inclusive design regularly–miscategorize the concept?

KH: It’s funny. You know, I had to fight really hard for the words “inclusive design” when we brought it into Microsoft. There was pressure, “Let’s call it universal design or accessibility.” I had to say, “No, this is a distinct thing. It’s a way of making that has its own set of practices.”

Now, seeing so many companies and people interested in inclusion, I couldn’t ask for better timing. The part that is a challenge, sometimes, is that companies focus on human resources first. When a company talks about inclusion, they talk about hiring practices and representation on their teams. Which is important! But tying it to work process is taking more time to internalize.

FC: Do you think the trend could go wrong, and see pushback or a dilution to inclusive design if people don’t really get it?

KH: My concern would be we exhaust the word before get to the work that needs to be done–that we’ll have inclusivity burnout before we do it.

A good analog might be sustainability as an idea that grew up to mean something. It was all the rage for a while, but it didn’t really make an impact until we got more specific about LEED certifications, and asking, “What are the types of green designs for architecture and urban planning?” It had to get specific and actionable.

The word “inclusion” has even more of a tendency to feel good than sustainability, so it’s easy for people to feel like they’re doing it just because they used the word.

Continue reading

Workshop in Inclusive Design from DMI

Jeanine Spence

Principal, Current Associates

Inclusive Design Workshop

Inclusive Design considers the full range of human diversity to deliver better experiences for everyone. This workshop  will help you focus on both a mind shift and changes to your design and research methods that will:

  • Help you recognize your biases/exclusion
  • Alter your practices to reduce exclusion
  • Help you see ways to bring others along on the transformation journey

This workshop starts with an overview of Inclusive Design principles, the impacts of exclusion, and the business case for inclusion. The centerpiece of the workshop is the Inclusive Design Practices Framework, an immersive examination of how learning from diverse lived experiences challenges designers to approach problems from new perspectives and to let go of the fictional “average customer”.

This approach moves past typical accessibility considerations to emphasize making products and services that work better for everyone. In the concluding section, participants reflect on how their design and research practices will evolve when inclusion is the focus.

Who Should Attend?

  • Designers / Design Leaders
  • Design Researchers
  • Product Managers
  • Individual contributors whose work has an impact on the future of the organization
  • Human Resources Professionals

What Will You Learn?

  • You’ll learn to recognize how products and experiences unintentionally exclude people.
  • Get a framework that will give you concrete ways to include more perspectives and create more inclusive results for a broader impact.

Pricing:

This workshop is being held in conjunction with the Innovative Thinking on Diversity & Inclusion Conference
If you are attending the conference: $300 per person

If you are not attending the conference: $450 per person

Register for The Workshop Here

Location:

LPK Mansion and Innoventures Hall
22 Garfield Place
Cincinnati, OH

Specialized Training Course in Accessibility and Inclusive Design in Portugal

The School of Architecture of the University of Minho (EAUM) promotes once again the specialized training course in Accessibility and Inclusive Design. This specialized training course aims to answer to the challenges of the current market, increasingly sensitive to the problems of the elderly or disabled.

Providing an update of the contents and examples of good practices on accessibility and inclusion in the design of spaces and products. The concept of inclusive design promotes the development of solutions that improve the lives of all people, regardless of their abilities or condition, benefiting everyone as it consider new requirements and generally translate into innovative solutions.

The specialized training course, scheduled to begin on April 13, for a period of 12 weeks, will take place on Friday afternoons at the Azurém Campus of the University of Minho, Guimarães.

Application DEADLINE: MARCH 21

VISIT SITE

For further information, please contact us through email c.pegadogico@arquitetura.uminho.pt or phone +351253510500

 

Designing for and Teaching Accessibility

To raise awareness and provide specific examples of ways to incorporate principles of accessibility into professional practice and design education, Design Incubation and AIGA/New York is inviting a group of scholars, practitioners and industry leaders to discuss accessible digital design and its relevance to the New York design community.

A morning panel discussion will provide a venue for experts to share their knowledge and an optional afternoon workshop will promote understanding of basic accessibility issues, concepts and best practices.

At a minimum, criteria for success of a designed product, service or experience should be its usability by everyone, regardless of their abilities or disabilities. Since digital access is a Civil Right covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, the question of usability and access are now as important to digital and interactive designers as to those who produce products and physical artifacts.

“Inclusive design” theory and practice are becoming the norm with companies increasingly expecting employees to know the common standards and specifications for accessible interfaces which are used by people with disabilities (and meet legally mandated ADA compliance standards). Unfortunately, even as progress has been made in industry, teaching digital accessibility is rarely part of design curriculum or undergraduate course work.

For more information, see http://aigany.org/event/designing-teaching-accessibility/

All are welcome, but this workshop will be most useful for designers and educators who are less familiar with best practices around accessible design and want to learn more about how to practice and/or teach inclusive digital access and interactive design/graphic design/visual communications.

Saturday, 14 April 2018
10:00-4:00 pm
General Assembly, New York City

9:45AM-10:00AM Attendee check-in

10:00AM-12:00PM Panel Discussion
Bo Campbell is an Interaction Designer and Accessibility Design Lead at IBM.

Elizabeth Guffey teaches art and design history at SUNY Purchase. She is author of several books, including Designing Disability: Symbols, Spaces and Society

Liz Jackson is the founder of the Inclusive Fashion & Design Collective, a disability design organization that is focused on increasing the impact of beautiful, functional products in our everyday lives and in the global economy.

Neil Ward is currently an Assistant Professor of Graphic Design at Drake University.

1:00PM-4:00PM Workshop (limited space)
Integrating Accessibility Workshop:
Inclusive Design Methodologies and Practice
Bo Campbell, Accessibility Design Lead for IBM, will conduct a workshop on accessible design while focusing on disability as a design challenge.